Texas Leadership Charter Academy Lawsuit: When Discipline Becomes a Crime

Until recently, the majority of people outside of San Angelo, Texas, had never given the gymnasium much thought. It’s a typical room with scuffed floors, folded bleachers pressed up against the walls, and a subtle rubber and old sneaker odor.

About eighty students entered that room for athletics class early on February 25, 2026. What transpired next is now the focus of a federal lawsuit, numerous hospital admissions, and what lawyers are describing as one of the worst instances of institutional child abuse they have ever witnessed.

Key Information	Details
Institution Name	Texas Leadership Charter Academy (TLCA) — San Angelo Campus
Type	Public Charter School
Location	San Angelo, Texas, USA
Parent Organization	Texas Leadership Public Schools
CEO / Superintendent	Walt Landers
Incident Date	February 25, 2026
Lawsuit Filed	April 10, 2026
Court & Case No.	193rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County — Cause No. DC-26-06347
Plaintiffs	Twelve families of student athletes
Students Hospitalized	Approximately 20
Medical Diagnosis	Rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown leading to potential kidney failure)
Hospital Stay Duration	2 to 7 days per student
Allegations	Systemic child abuse, gross negligence, willful misconduct, institutional cover-up
Defendants Named	TLCA San Angelo, 4 administrators, 2 former coaches, 2 current coaches
Law Firm Representing Plaintiffs	Cherry Johnson Siegmund James
Legal Basis	Revised Chapter 118, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code
School’s Response	Statement citing pending litigation; unable to comment on specifics

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of twelve families, claims that a head football coach at Texas Leadership Charter Academy gave the students instructions to perform push-ups continuously for at least 45 minutes while being driven by a whistle, without water, and without rest. When kids began to cry, the punishment—which was purportedly brought on by a jersey error made by the coaches themselves—did not end.

Students collapsing didn’t stop it. Students reported that by the time it was over, they had completed between 300 and 420 push-ups while five coaches circled around them, allegedly making fun of anyone who appeared tired. The doors to the gym were shut. There was nowhere to go.

Those pupils returned to school the following morning in excruciating pain. Many were unable to raise their arms to brush their teeth or eat breakfast. Some were unable to put on their own clothing. Before you grasp the medical reality involved, it’s nearly impossible to imagine a teenager in need of assistance with a shirt. According to the lawsuit, coaches made students perform push-ups for an additional two days.

About twenty students had been diagnosed with rhabdomyolysis, a condition in which damaged muscle tissue releases proteins into the bloodstream at a rate that the kidneys are unable to handle, by late February or early March. It could be lethal. According to the lawsuit, the mortality rate in severe cases ranges from 30 to 50 percent. Muscle enzyme levels in one child were reportedly close to 750 times the upper limit of normal.

Not only is the physical harm in this case unsettling, but it’s difficult to ignore the alleged aftermath. The lawsuit claims that no school official contacted any of the impacted families while their kids were in the hospital. Not one. Rather, the lawsuit claims that school administration discreetly reassigned coaches, added liability waivers to enrollment materials, and told staff to remove emails. The filing refers to “cover-up mode,” and after reading the accusations, it’s hard to come up with a better term.

The Texas Leadership Charter Academy, Texas Leadership Public Schools, CEO Walt Landers, four administrators, and four coaches—two former and two current—are all named as defendants in the lawsuit, which was filed in the 193rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County under Cause No.

DC-26-06347. The families were represented by the legal team at Cherry Johnson Siegmund James, which presented the case in a clear and purposeful manner: “This case is about adults who tortured children.” That’s not headline-worthy hyperbole. It appears to be an accurate accounting of what the lawsuit claims happened based on what the medical records purport to show.

The school released a statement through Curtis Milbourn, its compliance director, stating that it was unable to comment on specifics due to ongoing legal proceedings and privacy laws. According to the statement, student safety is still the school’s “top priority.” The institutional response that seems to have been written to defend the institution rather than the students has a certain flatness to it when you read it. A court will eventually consider whether that is reasonable to assume.

When sending a child to school, most parents don’t consider rhabdomyolysis. It’s the kind of medical term you come across when military recruits or marathon runners are pushed past their physical limits. A number of the students in this case have been informed that they may be subject to long-term physical activity restrictions, which could have a decades-long impact on their futures, athletic aspirations, and health.

Kidney specialists have been recommended to some. The hospital stays were lengthy. Both physical and non-physical trauma seem to have been severe. What long-term repercussions each student will face is still unknown.

A more general question about oversight in charter school settings may eventually come to light as a result of the Texas Leadership Charter Academy lawsuit: who is keeping an eye on situations where administrators respond to misconduct by reassigning staff instead of reporting it, when legal waivers subtly appear in paperwork, or when families receive no communication from a school while their children are hooked up to IVs?

Charter schools have a unique level of autonomy that can be extraordinary when handled properly. When in the wrong hands, it can blow whistles over children pleading to stop and shut doors. San Angelo families aren’t waiting to learn what kind of institution they entrusted their children to. They’re in court already.