A scandal that feels both deeply symbolic and personal has been exposed by Grammy-winning worship artist Chandler Moore’s lawsuit against Norman Gyamfi, the CEO of Maverick City Music. The case, which was filed in early October 2025, lays out a trail of alleged deception, forgery, and stolen royalties that has rocked one of the most respected collectives in Christian music. The narrative reads more like a contemporary parable about faith, trust, and power than it does like a straightforward business dispute.
According to the 33-page complaint, Moore accuses Gyamfi of forging his signature on contracts, siphoning over $800,000 in royalties, and secretly transferring ownership of his master recordings to Sony Music’s The Orchard without consent. In addition, the lawsuit alleges that Gyamfi violated his fiduciary duty as Moore’s manager and business partner by falsifying financial records and transferring profits through a network of businesses connected to TRIBL Records and Maverick City.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Chandler David Moore |
| Birthdate | March 21, 1995 |
| Birthplace | Charleston, South Carolina, USA |
| Occupation | Singer, Songwriter, Worship Leader |
| Known For | Co-founder of Maverick City Music, Grammy-winning artist |
| Lawsuit Filed | October 1, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Defendant | Norman Gyamfi, CEO of Maverick City Music and TRIBL Records |
| Allegations | Forgery, breach of fiduciary duty, and $800,000 in stolen royalties |
| Legal Claims | Fraud, misappropriation of assets, and unauthorized sale of master recordings |
What makes this story particularly compelling is the contrast between the message of Maverick City Music and the nature of the allegations. Founded in 2018 as a collective to break down racial and social barriers through worship, Maverick City quickly became a global phenomenon. Songs that combined passion and purpose, such as Jireh and Promises, moved audiences to tears. However, the collective is now facing an accusation that remarkably resembles the corruption in the industry it once aimed to combat.
Another level of drama was introduced by the timing of Moore’s lawsuit. He called the decision “bittersweet” and announced his departure from the group just one week prior to filing. He talked about community, thankfulness, and creative rebirth in his heartfelt and optimistic Instagram statement. Still, between the lines, there was an unmistakable undertone of exhaustion, perhaps even quiet disillusionment.
The lawsuit claims that Gyamfi’s wrongdoing began in 2021 and was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Moore specifically alleges that in order to complete a publishing agreement that transferred his creative rights to Sony Music Entertainment, his former manager used electronic forgeries. According to the lawsuit, Moore was not aware of these purported transactions, which essentially erased his control over the music he had composed, recorded, and distributed to millions of people.
According to one of the most prominent claims, Gyamfi “abused his position of trust to steal assets and hide profits,” transferring money through companies like TRIBL Publishing, Insignia Holdings, and Maverick City Music. This network, the lawsuit claims, gave Gyamfi full control of both creative and financial outputs — an arrangement remarkably efficient for profit but devastating for accountability.
Gyamfi has not made any public remarks, but his business partner and co-founder of Maverick City, Jonathan Jay, responded on social media, describing the allegations as “categorically false.” By accusing Moore of “avoiding accountability” and “attempting to break agreements freely made,” his statement shifted the blame to Moore. However, as legal professionals have pointed out, these answers frequently leave more questions than they solve.
Gyamfi developed a persona that many found appealing and ambitious by capitalizing on his standing as a spiritual leader and astute businessman. However, his strategy for handling the Christian music industry, especially his remarks on a 2025 podcast characterizing Maverick City as a “cash cow” of gospel music, drew harsh criticism from seasoned professionals in the field. One of the most reputable people in gospel, Marvin Sapp, publicly criticized those comments, reminding listeners that ministry has always been about message, not money.
According to Moore, the lawsuit is a struggle for artistic identity as well as for recompense. Millions of people have found solace and hope in his songs, which have spread across continents. To learn that those very works may have been sold or exploited without his consent strikes a deeply emotional chord. “He trusted the system,” one close friend shared, “and that trust was repaid with betrayal.”
Some have compared Moore’s legal battle to well-known music disputes like Prince’s well-known run-in with Warner Bros. or Taylor Swift’s battle over her masters. However, the spiritual context of Moore’s situation is especially novel. This is about the sanctity of artistic expression in a setting where ministry and music coexist, not just about ownership or royalties.
The case also underscores a growing issue in the Christian music industry: the corporatization of worship. Once defined by intimacy and authenticity, the genre has evolved into a multi-million-dollar business. Transparency can become dangerously muddled when profit and faith collide, as the lawsuit implies. Through this legal challenge, Moore may have unintentionally exposed an uncomfortable truth about how “business-first” models have infiltrated spaces once governed by service and sincerity.
Despite the storm, Moore’s tone remains remarkably optimistic. He steers clear of resentment and instead emphasizes rebirth in his social media posts. He talks about creating a future that is “rooted in integrity and purpose,” suggesting that independence and creative freedom may characterize his next phase. In an exceptionally quick comeback that demonstrates tenacity and resolve, he has already confirmed new solo projects for early 2026.
People have come together to support him. Tasha Cobbs Leonard and Le’Andria Johnson, two fellow artists, have publicly praised Moore’s bravery in facing wrongdoing. His stand has been particularly beneficial in sparking overdue conversations about artist rights within Christian circles, an area long left unexamined due to the fear of appearing divisive.
Despite the lingering controversy, Maverick City Music is still performing and recording. The group’s leadership insists that it will “stand on integrity,” but rebuilding public trust will require far more than statements. Supporters have become more outspoken in their desire for openness about management procedures, royalties, and contracts.
Beyond the pews of the church, this case has societal ramifications. It has made people think more broadly about how organizations, even religious ones, need to change to meet the demands of contemporary accountability. For young artists pursuing careers in faith-based entertainment, the scenario is especially instructive because it shows how idealism and commercial realities can clash.
If successful, this lawsuit, according to industry observers, could significantly strengthen Christian music artists’ rights and establish a standard for open contracts and moral management. Moore may encourage a new generation of worship artists to take back creative and legal control of their voices by opposing established power structures.
