Initially, the tremor was but a whisper beneath the floorboards. When the March 28, 2025, earthquake from Myanmar hit, it quickly became more severe than Bangkok could withstand. There was a violent rattle of windows. Sathorn’s half-built skyscraper crumbled like a piece of folded paper. What’s more disturbing is that government warnings came too late to make a difference. It shook preconceived notions about readiness in addition to shaking buildings that morning.
Thailand’s answer was remarkably quick and subtly ambitious. An AI-enabled seismic monitoring system that could identify, evaluate, and warn before calamity struck had been put into place by early 2026. One glaringly obvious example of how the nation is using technology to redefine disaster response is the new network, known as RUGON, which translates to “Know Before” in Thai.
Like a digital ear against the ground, RUGON is powered by real-time AI processing and is built on a grid of high-sensitivity accelerometers. A series of evaluations are initiated when it detects the first seismic waves, which are the ones that move the fastest but rarely cause harm. These occur in a matter of seconds, creating what is known as a Live ShakeMap. For entire cities, that map serves as a dynamic pulse check rather than only a static image.
In order to give emergency workers warnings up to three minutes in advance, the system places sensors at hospitals and important infrastructure nodes. While that may seem short, it seems like an eternity during an earthquake. An ICU can be cleared in three minutes or it can get chaotic. between witnessing a train derail and halting an elevated train.
| Key Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Event Trigger | 7.7-magnitude quake in Myanmar on March 28, 2025 |
| Impact on Thailand | Shaking in Bangkok; building collapse; disaster zone declared |
| System Deployed | RUGON AI-enabled seismic monitoring network |
| Lead Developer | Chulalongkorn University |
| National Rollout Plan | 100 stations across Thailand by end of 2026 |
| Core Feature | AI-driven real-time “Live ShakeMap” for early warning (1–3 mins) |
| Key Use Case | Hospital and high-rise alert integration in Bangkok |
| Credible Source | ASEANNOW – Bangkok Quake Coverage |

The way the technology strikes a balance between speed and sensitivity, created by academics at Chulalongkorn University, is especially novel. Beyond simply reporting movement, it also analyzes patterns, eliminates noise, and calculates probabilities while cross-referencing with international data streams from organizations like as the EMSC and USGS.
The RUGON network now has more than 50 stations after its experimental period, and it intends to treble that number before the year is over. The integration is planned for all Bangkok hospitals. Schools, transit, and even public housing will eventually be covered, creating a sort of unseen safety net that is spread throughout the terrain.
But technology doesn’t create trust on its own.
More than simply structural flaws were highlighted by the events of 2025; they also showed how estranged the public was from the safeguards in place. Many residents did not heed government warnings during the earthquake. They naturally resorted to Facebook postings, LINE discussions, and group chat friends instead. Several official alert mechanisms, like the Cell Broadcast Service and the Thai Disaster Alert app, were either inactive or still undergoing testing.
Nowadays, the silent moment when digital infrastructure failed to fulfill its human goal is mentioned in passing in all planning documents.
The new network is remarkably more than just reactive. It is a component of a larger governance transition from disjointed emergency response to integrated risk anticipation. Furthermore, civic tech platforms like ThaiWater and Traffy Fondue are crucial in humanizing the data, even as the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society leads the technical side.
Surat Thani, where I recently visited a city council office, had experienced a little earthquake only days earlier. A localized risk score along with a warning was part of the RUGON notice that was sent to the staff. Comparing the environment to what I had seen the previous year, I recall thinking how much quieter it felt. Good information grounded that quiet confidence, and it felt noticeably better.
AI has frequently been viewed as impersonal or clinical when used in disaster response. However, in this case, it is being logically integrated into current workflows. In order to accommodate various accessibility requirements, alerts now include audio cues, mapping forecasts, and visual aids. Though not flawless, it is improving.
Also, the system learns. With each tremor, its database grows. In detecting dangers, it gets progressively quicker, more precise, and more assured. By detecting changes too small for a single sensor to detect alone, the network adjusts collectively, much like a swarm of bees responding to minute changes in air pressure.
Thailand is also bringing these developments into line with policy in the broader context. Data integration, transparency standards, and ethical AI governance are all covered in the National AI Action Plan, which is in effect until 2030. This becomes much more crucial when the use of predictive algorithms grows. It is necessary to earn trust consistently, not just once.
Furthermore, public education is catching up. Early warning systems are only effective when individuals are able to understand how to use them. Drills are being conducted in schools. There are explanatory videos being shared by local authorities. Thailand is also sharing what it knows about crisis coordination in real time with its ASEAN neighbors, bringing knowledge into the region rather than just out of it.
Thailand’s program could soon become a model for Southeast Asia, a region that is often hit by natural disasters. It was not because it removed risk, but because it accepted it in a logical, wise, and unimpressed manner.
Currently, the sensors are still listening. dependable, steady, and quiet.
