Consistent profitability is rarely achieved in a straight line, particularly for an EV company that is still developing its brand. That trip has been as difficult for Rivian as the rocky terrain its electric trucks are designed to handle.
Rivian’s share price has fluctuated between extremes during the past year, peaking at $22.69 and most recently hovering around $14.76. That range represents uncertainty meeting possibilities in addition to volatility. Every earnings report, regulation change, and executive reorganization has affected investor sentiment. Despite all of that noise, Rivian has been able to hold onto momentum, which is much harder to quantify.
The business performed exceptionally well in the third quarter of 2025. Revenue increased by more than 78% to $1.56 billion, exceeding all analyst estimates. A final wave of EV tax credit-driven purchases, which boosted short-term sales but concealed the underlying friction points going forward, helped to lift that quarter.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Stock Price (RIVN) | $14.76 (as of Feb 11, 2026) |
| 52-Week Range | $10.36 – $22.69 |
| Market Cap | $18.09 Billion |
| Q3 2025 Revenue | $1.56 Billion (+78.3% YoY) |
| Q4 2025 Revenue Estimate | $1.28 Billion (−26.3% YoY) |
| EBITDA (Last 12 Months) | −$2.61 Billion |
| Vehicles Delivered (2025) | 42,247 |
| CFO Appointment | Azam Akhtar (Effective March 1, 2026) |
| Key Product Launch | R2 Midsize EV (Expected 2026) |
| Analyst Ratings | Mixed: Barclays, Cantor Neutral; UBS Sell |

The business is now entering a pivotal phase. Expectations for the Q4 2025 results, which are due on February 12, have significantly decreased. Analysts forecast a wider EBITDA loss of around $568 million and a 26.3% year-over-year decline in revenue, ending at $1.28 billion. It is a test, but not a disaster.
The production figures exhibit consistent, but unimpressive, increase. In 2025, Rivian supplied 42,247 automobiles, which was in the middle of its forecast. However, the initial goal had been to reach as many as 51,000 units. That deficiency isn’t being overlooked, but it’s also not being exaggerated. Producing almost 11,000 cars in Q4 is still a significant step for a business that is still learning how to scale.
Importantly, Rivian’s future chapter depends on what is still to be developed rather than what has already been constructed. Later this year, the R2, a more reasonably priced midsize EV, is expected to go on sale. Tech critics like Marques Brownlee have given it remarkably favorable initial reviews, describing it as a serious rival to Tesla’s Model Y.
Rivian has the chance to demonstrate that it can produce at scale, connect with a wider audience, and transcend niche appeal with the R2, which is more than just a new model. Rivian needs this model to do a lot of heavy lifting, both financially and symbolically, when EV tax subsidies expire and the economy changes.
Rivian seems to be carefully preparing for this next stage by designating Azam Akhtar as CFO, beginning March 1. Akhtar has years of expertise at General Motors, where operational effectiveness and cost restraint were required rather than optional. Greg Revelle, who suggests a more aggressive focus on marketing and customer interaction, joins him as Chief Customer Officer.
The opinions of analysts are still mixed. Barclays set a price objective of $14 and maintained a neutral rating. UBS boosted its objective to $15 but downgraded the stock to sell. Wolfe Research reiterated a pessimistic outlook, citing cash burn issues and setting the price ceiling at $16. This discrepancy is not unexpected. Consensus is rarely reached at the nexus of possibility and risk, where Rivian operates.
The launch of Rivian’s upcoming driver-assistance subscription, Autonomy+, has the potential to change that narrative. Autonomy+, which is priced much lower than Tesla’s Full Self-Driving system, is expected to be unexpectedly cost-effective without sacrificing necessary features. Additionally, it is an implied recognition that software margins are important, particularly in situations where vehicle margins are extremely narrow.
I recently saw a family packing camping supplies into a shiny R1S during a stop in Colorado. I was impressed by Rivian’s stealthy penetration of lifestyle markets that conventional manufacturers frequently ignore. I was reminded at that moment that this company may remain relevant without dominating headlines.
But profitability isn’t the same as significance. The expectation for EBITDA is still wildly negative. Rivian has reaffirmed that it anticipates losses of up to $2.25 billion in 2025. The road to break-even is still a long way off, even with moderate capital expenditure guidance of $1.8 to $1.9 billion.
Investors haven’t abandoned the company, though. In part because Rivian’s main product is incredibly durable and well-designed. in part because its leadership takes calculated actions rather than making grandiose promises. Even when this business falters, there’s a certain assurance in the way it develops.
Although they exceeded forecasts, competitors Ford and General Motors have already posted slight Q4 reductions. Rivian must follow suit, ideally with a delivery projection that slightly exceeds 2025 totals and some indication of how the R2 rollout will proceed.
Although they won’t completely determine Rivian’s destiny, the upcoming 12 months will undoubtedly have an impact on its course. Now, execution is crucial. Rivian might change from being a speculative bet to a strategic hold if R2 meets its timeframe, Autonomy+ draws subscribers, and Akhtar controls burn without stifling innovation.
