The Trump-backed Working Families Tax Cuts Act gave rise to the federal Education Freedom Tax Credit, which she wanted Pennsylvania to choose to participate in. She sounded almost perplexed. Why hadn’t Shapiro joined yet, she questioned?

On the surface, the question seems reasonable. Regarding education policy, Shapiro has never been a reliable source. When he was running for governor in 2022, he publicly endorsed private school vouchers, which sparked harsh criticism from proponents of public education and teachers’ unions. The political math became more complicated in 2023.

He used a line-item veto to remove the $100 million PASS voucher program from the state budget in the face of a divided legislature and strong opposition. The perception of him in Harrisburg was altered by that one act. It was dubbed pragmatic by some. Some referred to it as a retreat.

Walking through the Capitol’s corridors these days gives the impression that school choice has evolved from a policy discussion to a loyalty test. McMahon’s campaign is a component of a larger federal initiative that provides tax credits of up to $1,700 for contributions made to Scholarship Granting Organizations. The majority of the 29 states that have already chosen to participate are run by Republican governors. McMahon would not specifically name a few Democrats who have also joined.

In a sense, Pennsylvania already has its own version of this. Donations from individuals and businesses are directed toward private school tuition assistance through the Educational Improvement Tax Credit and the Opportunity Scholarship Tax Credit, which together accounted for up to $590 million in the most recent budget. McMahon cited those initiatives as proof that Shapiro has no philosophical disagreements. Simply put, he is reluctant to fly a federal flag on state territory.

And there’s the political calculation that no one wants to publicly discuss. The Pennsylvania State Education Association and other teacher unions are adamantly opposed to vouchers in any form. Last year, fifty labor leaders signed a letter endorsing Shapiro, even though they acknowledged that they disagree with him on certain issues. A governor who won’t fully support their cause but also won’t sell them out could be the subtle compromise keeping things together.

Shapiro has been publicly urged to join by newly elected Republican Senator Dave McCormick, who is currently co-sponsoring the federal proposal. He has made speeches, penned opinion pieces, and declared that Pennsylvania must take this opportunity. As McCormick discusses the American dream and children in underfunded districts at the Penn Harris Hotel on Friday, it’s difficult to ignore how at ease Republicans have become in portraying school choice as an opportunity rather than an ideology.

For his part, Shapiro hasn’t shut the door. He has stated that the legislature must send him a bill. That is quintessential Shapiro: methodical, cautious, and always giving himself space. He is someone who absorbs new information and adapts, according to State Representative Peter Schweyer. Others perceive a delay.

It’s still unclear what will happen next. 2026 is not 2023, and the pressure is not lessening. Shapiro is now well-known across the country, there are rumors that he may become president, and the state constantly reminds him that he can’t win over everyone. The most difficult political decision isn’t always yes or no. It’s the length of time you can say “maybe.”

The post The Great School Choice Divide: Pennsylvania’s Governor Faces Mounting Federal Pressure appeared first on Creative Learning Guild.