Morrison Naqvi Lawsuit: The ICE Detention Story That Unraveled in Real Time

When a story simultaneously touches all of the emotional triggers—immigration enforcement, a woman of color, a detention facility, and a politician coming forward—a certain kind of chaos results. It was all in Sundas Naqvi’s account. It seemed, for a few weeks in March, to be precisely the kind of tale that characterizes a time period.

Naqvi, a 28-year-old Pakistani American citizen who also goes by Sunny and Summer, claimed that after returning from a business trip to Turkey, she and five coworkers were arrested by ICE at Chicago O’Hare. On March 8, a family friend, Cook County Commissioner Kevin Morrison, held a press conference outside the Broadview Detention Center with cell phone location maps in hand, citing what he called timestamped proof that Naqvi had visited the facility.

Key Information: Morrison-Naqvi Lawsuit
Primary Subject	Sundas “Sunny” Naqvi, 28, US citizen of Pakistani descent, Illinois resident
Incident Date	March 5–7, 2025 — claimed 43-hour ICE detention
Location Claimed	O’Hare International Airport → Broadview Detention Center → Dodge County Jail, Wisconsin
Kevin Morrison	Cook County Commissioner, also a congressional candidate at the time of the press conference
Press Conference Date	March 8, 2025 — Morrison held public event outside Broadview facility
DHS Response	Confirmed secondary screening at O’Hare (approx. 56 minutes), denied all detention claims
Dodge County Sheriff	Dale Schmidt — filed civil defamation suit in federal court April 2025
Lawsuit Amount	$1 million in damages sought from Naqvi, Morrison, and 10 unnamed defendants
Hotel Evidence	Records show Naqvi checked into Hampton Inn & Suites, Rosemont, IL at 1:17 p.m. on March 5
Criminal Charges	None filed against Naqvi as of April 2025
Sheriff’s Statement	Schmidt says accusations damaged his reputation and electoral standing
Morrison’s Comment	Confirmed awareness of lawsuit via email, declined further comment citing pending litigation

Then, he claimed, her phone pinged a detention facility located more than 150 miles away in Dodge County, Wisconsin. He referred to it as a cover-up. He described it as “terrifying.” The cameras were in motion.

The speed at which officials denied the account is difficult to ignore. Shortly after, the Department of Homeland Security took action. Days later, DHS shared surveillance screenshots from O’Hare on X, asserting that the video unmistakably showed Naqvi walking back into the public area at 11:42 a.m. and entering secondary screening at 10:46 a.m.

Fifty-six minutes. Not forty-three hours. Morrison retaliated, calling the pictures “clearly doctored” and insisting on the release of the entire video. This escalation—a county commissioner accusing a federal agency of fabricating evidence—was an important allegation. Later on, it would be crucial in a court of law.

On April 10, Dodge County Sheriff Dale Schmidt held his own press conference. His tone was more akin to restrained rage. Schmidt claimed that the results of his investigation, which he claimed personally took a lot of time, included hotel records, witness statements, Flock camera surveillance footage, and gas station footage, all of which together presented a very different picture. Schmidt claims that on March 5, at 1:17 p.m., Naqvi checked into a Hampton Inn and Suites in Rosemont, Illinois, during the exact hours she claimed to be in federal custody.

Schmidt claimed that camera footage showed her at a gas station in Slinger, never close to the jail, and that she had reportedly gone to Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, on March 7, ostensibly to help a friend or family member. “She was not detained by ICE at any time,” he stated categorically. He claimed that everything was made up.

Schmidt filed the Morrison Naqvi lawsuit in federal civil court, requesting $1 million in damages from Morrison, Naqvi, and ten unidentified defendants. The defamation lawsuit is based on the allegation that Schmidt’s office unlawfully detained an American citizen, seriously harming both his reputation and his chances of winning reelection.

Schmidt appears to be well aware of how difficult it is to refute such an accusation. “Allegations of this nature carry significant consequences,” he stated in a measured tone, “impact reputations, resources, and public trust.”

The question of what Morrison knew and when is what keeps this story interesting. At the time, he was a candidate for Congress in addition to being a commissioner. The building where the press conference took place had already turned into a focal point for anti-ICE demonstrations. There is a feeling that the moment had a certain political gravity that made careful verification seem less urgent than it should have been. This feeling may be unfair, but it is real.

According to Morrison, the location data from cell phones seemed definitive. He might have actually believed it. However, there is a difference between believing something and confirming it, particularly when the cameras are already aimed at you.

No criminal charges have been brought against Naqvi. Schmidt claimed to have contacted the FBI and Illinois authorities, but he acknowledged that he had no obvious criminal path in Dodge County. It’s unclear if federal investigators will look into anything on their own. However, the civil case is proceeding, which puts Morrison in a difficult situation.

When contacted via email for comment, he gave a succinct response, stating that he had not seen the lawsuit and was unable to comment on ongoing legal proceedings. Legally, that makes sense. Additionally, it’s a far cry from the assurance he displayed in March.

The stakes for actual people are genuinely high, which is why stories about immigration enforcement are currently emotionally charged. However, before a microphone is activated, that emotional burden can reduce the amount of time someone spends posing challenging questions. It’s hard not to feel that everyone involved moved more quickly than the facts justified as you watch this develop over the course of a month, with every new piece of evidence changing the picture.

A commissioner and a 28-year-old woman are currently being sued by a sheriff for a million dollars each. That result was not predetermined, regardless of what the courts decide. One press conference at a time, it was the result of decisions made.